Our identities are academics, as practitioners is interrelated to our own lives, our families and their life paths. In that negotiation, we do make inconsistent decisions, inconsistent not with our general wellbeing but our ideologies..does that make us hypocrites?
The question of stance...in my role as a critical scholar, have I not taken a stance already? My stance might not be a clean one but is one which is a negotiated one, a constantly pulsing patchwork of commitments, sacrifices, articulations and changing positions brought about by my diverse thinking and increasing exposure...So, when as an academic I raise the question of existing in a department which is uncritical of economic logic...where am I going? What are my options? How much guts do I have to take an option? Or my life is a constantly interchangeable, malleable collection of positions in which the only thread is my raising of critical questions? Can I be happy with this life?
We with our access to knowledge and our incessant articulations have become slaves to it and our words are replete with multiple meanings. This is a very privileged position. This means I can choose different meanings as per the person, the situation or my argument and I deconstruct the way I want to. Smart!! But what are knowledge laborers and knowledge producers? I would hate to belong in either category....maybe I am a knowledge consumer!! ;)
Does my articulation of critical theory from my position negate myself?
No comments:
Post a Comment